Posted by
grad_1986 on Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:00:21 AM
There seems to be more at play here than what meets the eye. On the surface it looks like Obama is in charge as President of the United States. But below the surface there seems to be other people who are pulling the strings.
First let's look at Obama's over use of the teleprompters. He seems to rely on them as if he has no idea what he is supposed to say until the prompter turns on. He hardly ever gives a speech without them being by his sides. One must wonder, is he being told what to say? For when he is "off-prompter" he fumbles and misspeaks as he is not fully aware as to what his handlers want him to say.
Next, let's look at how Obama is not in "sync" with other people in the administration. He says, AARP is "endorsing his healthcare plan" yet AARP has done no such thing. His Health-and-Human-Services Secretary, Kathleen Reuters, says in an interview that the "public option" is "optional" and doesn't need to be part of the health-care bill. But the next day, Obama makes the press statement that nothing has changed and that its is a MUST-have for the bill to pass his desk. Another example, Obama says he is not going to prosecute people of the previous administration for any "war crimes" or "torture crimes", yet his own AG William Holder comes out and says he is going to assemble panels to investigate wrongful torture used by the CIA. Are these people not communicating to each other (boss to employee) or are they not getting the same memos from "on high" ( BIG-boss to employees). Maybe there is some disagreement between Obama and his "bosses" on this issue. Maybe he doesn't want to prosecute, but "they" do.
Also, there is the question of the people who he has assembled around him in his administration. People like his Green-Jobs czar, Van Jones, who is openly espousing COMMUNIST. There is also, Mark Lloyd his "diversity officer" in the FCC who also espouses communism (he especially praises Hugo Chavez and his revolution in Venezuela) and wants to "fine" radio companies that are not "diverse enough" 100% of their operating costs for the year (essentially put them out of business). There is also his science czar, John Holdren, who thinks what China has done with force sterilization and 1-child-per-family is a "good thing". So why would the first black president want to smear his image with people like this? Wouldn't Obama want to go the route of Jackie Robinson and set a good example for those who follow him? Unless of course, he had no choice in the matter and other people are telling him who will be in his administration. He may be like a football quarterback with a microphone in his helmet, he may be given the "game plan in the locker room, but is not being allowed to "call the plays on the field".
Finally, are these very LARGE bills that appear out of thin air that most on the democrat side have no interest in reading as if they "know who wrote them and therefore trust their direction". Here we are just 6 months into the Obama administration and we have had 1073 page bill for the stimulus bill, 1200 page Cap-and-Trade bill and 1300 page Health-Care bill. Where did these come from? Who wrote them? They certainly did not write themselves! Do the democrats have magic little elves running around whipping these up for them? I seriously doubt that. No! Instead these were written up by groups like ACORN and the SEIU and communist groups like "The Apollo Project". And who is funding these groups? Is George Soros? Probably. Also, one has to wonder when the President has his weekly meeting with the head of the SEIU, who is talking and who is listening?
We need to ask these questions and need to find out ....
WHO IS IN CHARGE HERE?